Key result
A pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol was as effective as usual physician care in maintaining time in the therapeutic INR range (71.3% vs 66.2%, p=0.447) while requiring significantly fewer INR tests.
Why the study?
Does a pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol improve time in INR therapeutic range in long-term care residents on warfarin?
Cohort (n=197)
Yes
Does a pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol improve time in INR therapeutic range in long-term care residents on warfarin?
Absolute Event Rate: 71.3% vs 66.2%
p-value: p=0.447
A pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol in long-term care facilities reduces the number of INR tests required without compromising time in therapeutic range or safety, while improving staff satisfaction.
Supports pharmacist-managed warfarin protocols for fewer INR tests; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Warfarin is an anticoagulant prescribed to 12% of long-term care residents to reduce the risk of thrombo-embolism. This study used indicators to compare warfarin management by pharmacists to usual care. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing a pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol with usual care of qualified warfarin recipients at long-term care facilities (two protocol, one control) in Calgary, Alberta. We compared the proportion of international normalized ratio (INR) tests in the range 2.0 to 3.0, time in range, number of tests, and frequency of bleeding at protocol and control sites. Our primary outcome, time in INR therapeutic range, is an indicator for assuring care quality. A cross-sectional survey at these sites compared health professionals' perceptions of workload and effectiveness of warfarin management. RESULTS: Of the 197 residents' charts reviewed in the study period, those on protocol had 45.0 INR tests while those on usual care had 52.7 tests (p = .034, 95% CI for the difference: 0.6 to 14.6 INR tests). No significant difference was found for time in therapeutic range, number of tests in range, or major bleeding events. Of 178 health professionals surveyed, those from protocol facilities were more satisfied with warfarin management (p = .013). Workload and safety were perceived similarly at all sites. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that a pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol is as effective as usual care and has advantages pertaining to work satisfaction, knowledge of drug interactions, consistent documentation, and fewer INR tests. Further research on teamwork and coagulation management in long-term care facilities is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sargent et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Warfarin therapy in long-term care (n=197). Pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol vs. Usual care (physician-managed warfarin dosing) was evaluated on Proportion of time within INR therapeutic range 2.0 to 3.0 (95% CI -18.3% to 8.1%, p=0.447). A pharmacist-managed warfarin protocol was as effective as usual physician care in maintaining time in the therapeutic INR range (71.3% vs 66.2%, p=0.447) while requiring significantly fewer INR tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: