Key result
Lower LVEF is linked to VT recurrence after ablation, though the ~4% difference lacks robustness.
Why the study?
CMR may offer insights into arrhythmogenic substrate in patients undergoing VT ablation, but its prognostic value remains uncertain.
Do CMR-derived parameters predict ventricular tachycardia recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Meta-Analysis (n=415)
Do CMR-derived parameters predict ventricular tachycardia recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
CMR-derived functional and structural parameters have limited and inconsistent associations with VT recurrence after catheter ablation, suggesting they should not be used as standalone tools for risk stratification.
CMR parameters should not yet inform post-VT ablation recurrence risk; leaves open need for larger standardized prospective studies.
Background Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may provide insights into arrhythmogenic substrate in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, but its prognostic value remains uncertain. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, of available studies comparing CMR-derived parameters in patients with and without VT recurrence after ablation, from inception to March 2026. Primary outcomes included functional parameters - left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular (LV) mass, while secondary outcomes included ventricular volumes and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) derived structural characteristics. Random-effects models were applied. Results Seven studies including 415 patients were analyzed, with 36.1% experiencing VT recurrence. Lower LVEF was associated with recurrence in the primary analysis (mean difference: − 4.41%; 95% CI: − 8.66 to − 0.16; p = 0.044; I²=27.3%), however, this finding was not robust in leave-one-out analysis. No significant associations were observed for LV mass or ventricular volumes. Among structural parameters, transmural, epicardial, or septal LGE were not associated with recurrence. Conclusion Available evidence suggests that CMR-derived parameters have limited and inconsistent associations with VT recurrence after catheter ablation. Although reduced LVEF may be associated with recurrence, this finding was not robust in sensitivity analyses, while structural CMR characteristics showed no consistent associations. Larger prospective studies using standardized CMR protocols and time-to-event analyses are needed to better define the prognostic role of CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deaconu et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Ventricular tachycardia (n=415). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) vs. Patients without ventricular tachycardia recurrence was evaluated on Ventricular tachycardia recurrence (MD -4.41%, 95% CI -8.66 to -0.16, p=0.044). Lower left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with ventricular tachycardia recurrence after catheter ablation (MD -4.41%), though this finding was not robust in sensitivity analyses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: