Density functional theory calculations have been performed on intramolecular C(aryl)−X bond activation reactions in model N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes of the type Ru(NHC)(PH 3 ) 2 (CO), where NHC = 1-(C 6 H 4 -2-X)imidazol-2-ylidene (I( o- C 6 H 4 X), X = H, CH 3, F, OH, NH 2, OCH 3, and CF 3 ). In all cases C(aryl)−X activation is found to be thermodynamically favored, and the largest barrier to reaction is computed to be +21.3 kcal/mol when X = CH 3 . As C(aryl)−CH 3 bond activation has been observed experimentally for a Ru−NHC complex (Jazzar, R. F. R.; Macgregor, S. A.; Mahon, M. F.; Richards, S. P.; Whittlesey, M. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4944), this suggests that a wide range of heteroatom-substituted N-aryl NHC ligands may be susceptible to intramolecular bond activation and potential ligand degradation. The computed exothermicity of C(aryl)−X activation follows the trend X = NH 2 < CH 3 < H < OH ≈ OCH 3 < CF 3 < F, while the barriers vary as X = H < F < OH ≈ OCH 3 < CF 3 < NH 2 < CH 3 . Both series reflect the promotion of C(aryl)−X activation by the formation of stronger Ru−X bonds in the product. However, the ability of heteroatom ligands to stabilize the Ru(0) reactants through chelation can disfavor C(aryl)−X cleavage and explains the low exothermicity and high barrier associated with C(aryl)−NH 2 activation. For X = OCH 3 C(aryl)−O bond activation was found to be favored kinetically over O−C(alkyl) activation, although the latter process yields an extremely stable aryloxide product. The arrangement of coligands around the metal can significantly affect C(aryl)−X bond activation, and when X is a π-donor, this process is promoted by a trans CO ligand. These insights suggest not only possible ways to control unwanted C(aryl)−X activation in heteroatom-subtituted N-aryl NHC ligands but also factors that may promote such reactions in catalytic processes where this step is desirable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diggle et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: