Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Least-squares reverse-time migration (LSRTM) formulates reverse-time migration (RTM) in the least-squares inversion framework to obtain the optimal reflectivity image. It can generate images with more accurate amplitudes, higher resolution, and fewer artifacts than RTM. However, three problems still exist: (1) inversion can be dominated by strong events in the residual; (2) low-wavenumber artifacts in the gradient affect convergence speed and imaging results; (3) high-wavenumber noise is also amplified as iteration increases. To solve these three problems, we have improved LSRTM: firstly, we use Huber-norm as the objective function to emphasize the weak reflectors during the inversion; secondly, we adapt the de-primary imaging condition to remove the low-wavenumber artifacts above strong reflectors as well as the false high-wavenumber reflectors in the gradient; thirdly, we apply the L1-norm sparse constraint in the curvelet-domain as the regularization term to suppress the high-wavenumber migration noise. As the new inversion objective function contains the non-smooth L1-norm, we use a modified iterative soft thresholding (IST) method to update along the Polak-Ribière conjugate-gradient direction by using a preconditioned non-linear conjugate-gradient (PNCG) method. The numerical examples, especially the Sigsbee2A model, demonstrate that the Huber inversion-based RTM can generate high-quality images by mitigating migration artifacts and improving the contribution of weak reflection events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: