Alfalfa samples with low (.4%) and high (1.7%) saponin contents were evaluated in diets for rats, rabbits and swine. In two experiments, with 40 and 60% dietary alfalfa, growth of rats was greater (P<.05) with low saponin than with high saponin alfalfa. Freeze-dried vs air-dried alfalfa of the two types were compared; the saponin effect was unrelated to drying temperature. Rats pair-fed low saponin alfalfa at the same level of intake as voluntarily consumed by rats fed a high saponin alfalfa diet ad libitum had similar growth rates, suggesting that saponin affects growth mainly by limiting feed intake. In a series of feed preference trials, rats preferred low saponin alfalfa to the high saponin material. An alfalfa-free diet was preferred over both types of alfalfa, even with a level of alfalfa as low as 2.5%. Rabbits preferred high saponin alfalfa at low (20% or less) dietary levels, while at 35% or higher, the low saponin type was preferred. Rabbits preferred an alfalfa-free diet when alfalfa levels of 20% or higher were used. Young pigs (22 kg initial weight) had similar gains on an alfalfa-free diet and a 15% low saponin alfalfa diet, and lower (P<.05) gains with a 15% high saponin alfalfa diet. These results indicate that low saponin alfalfa supports a higher growth rate of rats and swine than high saponin material; the pair-feeding experiment and the feed preference trials suggest that increased palatability is the major factor involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheeke et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: