Eight dual-flow, continuous culture fermenters were used during four experimental periods to study effects of urea supplementation of diets containing ruminally protected soybean meal (SBM) protein and level of degraded N on bacterial metabolism of dietary nutrients. Treatments were arranged as a 2 × 4 factorial with two sources of protein and four levels of urea supplementation. Protein sources were untreated SBM (USBM) and calcium lignosulfonate-treated soybean meal (LSO3-SBM). Urea levels, expressed as a percentage of the total N input as urea-N, were 0, 10, 20 and 30%. Urea was added directly to fermenters via continuous infusion of a mineral buffer solution. Basal diets consisted of 10% alfalfa hay, 37% corn silage and 53% corn-SBM-based concentrate mix and had 16% CP (DM basis). Approximately 50% of the basal dietary N was derived from the SBM source. Protein source × urea level interactions were not significant for any measurements. Protein degradation and NH3-N concentrations were lower (P < .05) with LSO3-SBM diets (41.2% and 8.7 mg/100 ml, respectively) than with USBM diets (50.9% and 11.6 mg/100 ml, respectively), indicating that lignosulfonate treatment protected soybean protein from bacterial degradation. Ammonia-N concentrations, efficiency of bacterial protein synthesis, total bacterial N in the effluent, true OM digestion and cellulose digestion were higher (P < .05) with urea addition than with 0% urea. Linear responses (P < .05) in cellulose digestibility and efficiency of bacterial protein synthesis (g N/kg OM truly digested) and quadratic responses (P < .05) in true DM and OM digestibilities suggested that overall ruminal fermentation was enhanced as the level of degraded N supplied to the bacterial population was increased via increasing levels of urea supplementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Windschitl et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: