A series of mono- and dinuclear Ru complexes containing a bridging ligand, L-diimide-L (L = 2-(2-pyridyl)benzimidazole; diimide = benzene-1,2:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (bdi; pyromellitimide) or naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (ndi), with either propane or xylene group as linkers, have been prepared. The mono- and dinuclear Ru complexes containing the bdi or ndi ligand, exhibit characteristic metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transition at 458 nm. The mono- and dinuclear Ru/Os complexes exhibit a rich redox chemistry arising from both M(II) to M(III) oxidation and ligand-based consecutive reduction of diimide and 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy) ligands. The emission decays fit well with double- or triple-exponential decay models. The non-exponential decay curve reveals the existence of several conformers in solution due to the flexible propane or p -xylene linker. The much shorter emission lifetimes of the [M(bpy) 2 (L-diimide-L)] complexes compared with the parent [M(bpy) 2 L] indicates the intramolecular electron-transfer from the excited M(bpy) 2 moiety to the diimide. The fastest rates of electron transfer (3 · 10 10 s -1 ) are attributable to the folded conformers suitable for the electron donor/acceptor through-space interaction. A time-resolved absorption spectroscopic study of the dinuclear bdi and ndi complexes revealed appearance of the electron-transfer products, M(III) and the diimide radical anion, and their rapid disappearance. The effect of the linkers of the ligand L-diimide-L on the rates of electron transfer and the back electron transfer is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossain et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: