Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Cd and Te desorption from (001), (110), and (111)B CdTe surfaces have been studied as a function of temperature by measuring the electron beam current reflected from these surfaces. For Te, activation energies of 0.96, 1.23, and 2.04±{}0.10 eV have been found for (001), (110), and (111)B surface orientation, respectively. For Cd, activation energies of 1.9±{}0.1 and 1.96±{}0.10 eV are measured for the (111)B and the (001) CdTe surfaces, respectively, similar to the measured values of activation energy for the sublimation of these surfaces. A detailed analysis of the desorption process gives some enlightenment concerning two remarkable phenomena, namely, (i) a reversible transformation between a c(2×{}2)+(2×{}1) and a (2×{}1) reconstruction for (001) CdTe and (ii) a hysteresis cycle between a (1×{}1) and a c(8×{}4) surface for the (111)B CdTe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tatarenko et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: