Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Delays in Clinical Emergency Response Team (CERT) workflows and variability in post-event practices contribute to impaired response timeliness and documentation practices. Hybrid virtual–in-person response models may offer a feasible approach to improve response timeliness and reliability of post-event practices. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study evaluating a virtual CERT (vCERT) program that leveraged in-room audiovisual technology to enable immediate virtual response by a nurse practitioner (NP). Implementation occurred through a phased rollout, phase 1 (August 4, 2025; weekday day shifts) and phase 2 (September 29, 2025; expansion to 24/7 coverage). The study included 2,854 CERT activations between January 1 and December 31, 2025. The primary outcome was time to first NP contact, either in-person or virtual. Secondary outcomes included documentation compliance for post-event debriefs (structured team discussions immediately following an event) and four-hour follow-ups (scheduled reassessments four hours after an event). Outcomes were compared pre- and post-implementation. Results In the post-implementation period, 80.4% (952/1,184) of all activations utilized the vCERT program. Median time to first NP contact decreased by 90.3%, from 3.50 minutes (IQR 2.86–4.22) pre-implementation to 0.34 minutes (IQR 0.28–0.41) post-implementation ( P < .001). Post-event debrief documentation compliance increased from 43.3% to 70.6% ( P < .001), and four-hour follow-up documentation compliance increased from 10.1% to 26.6% ( P < .001). Conclusions This pre-post evaluation of a hybrid virtual–in-person emergency response model was associated with significant improvements in response timeliness and reliability of post-event activities. Collectively, these findings suggest that the vCERT model is feasible and may serve as an augmentation, rather than a replacement, of bedside care. Future studies should investigate the impact of such models on patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: