This article compares two processes of historiographical redescription. Two themes appear central to each: the final acknowledgement of the dispossession of the Indigenous inhabitants—what can be defined as the ‘founding violence'—and the defective nature of the legitimacy of the institutions of the state until a settlement with the dispossessed is finally reached. The ‘founding violence’ emerges in both cases as a crucial site for the production and reproduction of historical and historiographical discourses—a contested ground in the process of redefinition of national identity. Historical revisionisms and deadlocked ‘reconciliations'’
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorenzo Veracini (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: