Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is a growing literature discussing the role of different research methods in Tourism and Hospitality Research and, in particular, arguing that some re-evaluation of their use is necessary if Tourism and Hospitality is to become a progressive research programme. This paper argues that the literature does not address the philosophical consistency of the use of different methods. It either falls back onto a false dual of advocating quantitative or qualitative research methods, or fails to fully explore the justification for triangulating methods. This paper argues that, based in a philosophical position known as Critical Realism, a consistent research programme involving the triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods can be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Downward et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: