Two simple methods are given for obtaining the surface shape using a projected grid. After the camera is calibrated to the 3-D workspace, the only input date needed for the computation of surface normals are grid intersect points in a single 2-D image. The first method performs nonlinear computations based on the distortion of the lengths of the grid edges and does not require a full calibration matrix. The second method requires that a full parallel projection model of the imaging is available, which enables it to compute 3-D normals using simple linear computations. The linear method performed better overall in the experiments, but both methods produced normals within 4-8 degrees of known 3-D directions. These methods appear to be superior to methods based on shape-from-shading because the results are comparable, yet the equipment setup is simpler and the processing is not very sensitive to object reflectance.>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrikhande et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: