Key result
Sufficient speech and language therapy dosing drives aphasia recovery, with e-therapies showing promise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We now know that speech and language therapy (SALT) is effective in the rehabilitation of aphasia; however, there remains much individual variability in the response to interventions. So, what works for whom, when and how? RECENT FINDINGS: This review evaluates the current evidence for the efficacy of predominantly impairment-focused aphasia interventions with respect to optimal dose, intensity, timing and distribution or spacing of treatment. We conclude that sufficient dose of treatment is required to enable clinical gains and that e-therapies are a promising and practical way to achieve this goal. In addition, aphasia can be associated with other cognitive deficits and may lead to secondary effects such as low mood and social isolation. In order to personalise individual treatments to optimise recovery, we need to develop a greater understanding of the interactions between these factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doogan et al. (2018) conducted a review in Aphasia. Speech and language therapy (SALT) and e-therapies was evaluated on Clinical gains in aphasia recovery. Speech and language therapy requires a sufficient treatment dose to achieve clinical gains in aphasia recovery, with e-therapies offering a promising delivery method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: