Electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) has attracted much attention in the last decade, owing to its unique advantages such as operation at ambient conditions, coupling with renewable electricity, and producing a wide range of products and commodities. The majority of CO 2 RR studies are focused on pure CO 2 as feed, while in real CO 2 waste streams, such as flue gas or biogas, CO 2 concentration does not exceed 40%. Therefore, the economic feasibility of CO 2 RR and its carbon footprint are greatly limited by the CO 2 purification steps before electrolysis ($70–100 per ton of CO 2 for CO 2 /N 2 separation). In recent years, studies have exhibited the importance of this matter by integrating CO 2 capture and electroreduction in a single unit. Mostly, CO 2 capture solutions as electrolytes have been under attention, and promising results have been achieved to significantly improve the overall economy of CO 2 RR. The focus on CO 2 capture‐electroreduction integration can go beyond the solution/electrolyte‐based CO 2 capture (e.g., amine solutions and ionic liquids) and other processes such as solid adsorption and membrane‐based processes, as more efficient options, can be potentially integrated with CO 2 electroreduction in the gas‐diffusion electrode design. This article aims to review the recent efforts in integrating capture and electroreduction of CO 2 and provides new perspectives in material selection and electrode design for membrane‐ and adsorption‐based CO 2 capture‐reduction integration, in addition to the analysis of the economic feasibility of this integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabiee et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: