Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An examination of the chief executives of leading British railways from 1850 through 1922 indicates that they emerged from predominantly upper-middle and upper class origins, and that they represented a new kind of bureaucratic business elite which enjoyed rising incomes and growing social status. In addition, available evidence reveals nothing to suggest that “executive immobility” was characteristic of British railway management, or that the railways were particularly inefficient or unprogressive in their choice of senior managers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. R. Gourvish (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: