Key result
64-slice MDCT coronary angiography showed high diagnostic accuracy for significant coronary stenosis in type 2 diabetes, with patient-level sensitivity of 98.4% and specificity of 100.0%.
Why the study?
Does 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography accurately detect significant coronary stenosis compared to invasive coronary angiography in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=240)
Does 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography accurately detect significant coronary stenosis compared to invasive coronary angiography in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes?
64-slice MDCT coronary angiography provides high diagnostic accuracy comparable to invasive coronary angiography for detecting significant coronary stenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes, supporting its use as a noninvasive alternative.
BACKGROUND: A 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is well known to be a useful noninvasive form of angiography for the general population, but not for certain patients with diabetes. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery disease in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 240 patients were included, 74 of whom had type 2 diabetes (M:F=40:33; 41.8±9.5 years). We compared significant coronary stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing) in MDCT with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) by segment, artery, and patient. We also evaluated the influence of obesity and coronary calcium score on MDCT accuracy. RESULTS: Of the 4,064 coronary segments studied, 4,062 segments (T2DM=1,109) were assessed quantitatively by both MDCT and ICA, and 706 segments (T2DM=226) were detected as a significant lesion by ICA in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values for the presence of significant stenosis in T2DM were: by segment, 89.4%, 96.4%, 85.8%, and 97.4%, respectively; by artery (n=222), 95.1%, 92.9%, 94.4%, and 93.8%, respectively; by patients (n=74), 98.4%, 100.0%, 98.4%, and 90.0%, respectively. Regardless of presence of diabetes, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy. Obesity (≥25 kg/m(2)) and coronary calcium score did not also affect the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT. CONCLUSION: The 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography was found to have similar diagnostic accuracy with ICA, regardless of diabetes. These results suggest MDCT may be helpful to reduce unnecessary invasive studies for patients with diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moon et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=240). 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography vs. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) for significant coronary stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing). 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography showed high diagnostic accuracy for significant coronary stenosis in type 2 diabetes, with patient-level sensitivity of 98.4% and specificity of 100.0%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: