It has been demonstrated that ozone, probably through a mechanism of oxidative preconditioning (OP), protected the liver against the damage mediated by reactive oxygen species. Taking into account that iscehmic preconditioning (IschP) is also a protective mechanism, a comparative study between both preconditioning settings was performed in order to study the effectiveness of both protective procedures. Rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: 1- control, sham operated (anesthesia and laparotomy plus surgical manipulation); 2- I/R (ischemia for 90 min followed by 90 min reperfusion); 3- Ischp+I/R, as group 2 but submitted to a previous ischemic preconditioning (ischemia 10 min and reperfusion 10 min); 4- OzoneOP+I/R, as group 2 but submitted to a pervious oxidative preconditioning with 15 sessions, daily, of ozone by rectal administration (dose of 1 mg/kg). The comparison between both preconditionings showed no biochemical differences for the parameters evaluated. Nevertheless, the histological study demonstrated that the protective effect produced by the OzoneOP is superior to that achieved with the IschP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajamieh et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: