The study analyses the contribution of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP) in accessing financial, physical and natural capital by the newly resettled farmers and the implications on farmers’ livelihoods in Norton, Zimbabwe. There are no studies in Zimbabwe that interrogate how the FTLRP facilitated access to the above-referred three forms of capital and the effects on farmers’ livelihoods. To cover this gap, the study employed a qualitative approach characterised by use of in-depth interviews, documentary analysis and observation to collect data. The study found out that the FTLRP has enabled access to natural capital (land) to many families but there is inequality in terms of ownership of land by women and the youth as they are significantly disadvantaged. With time the farmers have accumulated physical assets in form of investments in irrigation equipment, ploughs, hoes, vehicles and many other assets. The early years of the newly resettled farmers were marked by declining productivity and attendant low financial income. With time farmers’ productivity has improved and consequently reaping of financial rewards has allowed the accumulation of physical assets. The farmers in Norton exist in a vulnerable context characterised by droughts, lack of government support, economic challenges and lack of timely inputs support. This has militated against success in the past and these challenges continue to affect farmers’ livelihoods. The study recommends timely government support to the farmers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itai Kabonga (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: