Key result
An implantable loop recorder for detecting atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke had an incremental cost of $40,796 per quality-adjusted life year gained compared with conventional monitoring.
Why the study?
Extended electrocardiography monitoring improves atrial fibrillation detection after cryptogenic stroke, but cost-effectiveness remains uncertain given upfront costs and projected long-term benefits.
Is extended electrocardiography monitoring (30-day or 3-year implantable loop recorder) cost-effective compared to conventional Holter monitoring for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke?
Is extended electrocardiography monitoring (30-day or 3-year implantable loop recorder) cost-effective compared to conventional Holter monitoring for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke?
Effect estimate: ICER $40,796 per QALY gained
Absolute Event Rate: 7.88% vs 7.77%
A three-year implantable loop recorder strategy is a cost-effective approach for detecting occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke patients compared to conventional Holter monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Timely identification of occult atrial fibrillation following cryptogenic stroke facilitates consideration of oral anticoagulation therapy. Extended electrocardiography monitoring beyond 24 to 48 h Holter monitoring improves atrial fibrillation detection rates, yet uncertainty remains due to upfront costs and the projected long-term benefit. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of three electrocardiography monitoring strategies in detecting atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to project the costs and outcomes of three different electrocardiography monitoring strategies (i.e. 30-day electrocardiography monitoring, three-year implantable loop recorder monitoring, and conventional Holter monitoring) in acute stroke survivors without previously documented atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: The lifetime discounted costs and quality-adjusted life years were $206,385 and 7.77 quality-adjusted life years for conventional monitoring, $207,080 and 7.79 quality-adjusted life years for 30-day extended electrocardiography monitoring, and $210,728 and 7.88 quality-adjusted life years for the implantable loop recorder strategy. Additional quality-adjusted life years could be attained at a more favorable incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year with the implantable loop recorder strategy, compared with the 30-day electrocardiography monitoring strategy, thereby eliminating the 30-day strategy by extended dominance. The implantable loop recorder strategy was associated with an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of $40,796 compared with conventional monitoring. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that the model was most sensitive to the rate of recurrent ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: An implantable loop recorder strategy for detection of occult atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke is more economically attractive than 30-day electrocardiography monitoring compared to conventional monitoring and is associated with a cost per quality-adjusted life year gained in the range of other publicly funded therapies. The value proposition is improved when considering patients at the highest risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. However, the implantable loop recorder strategy is associated with increased health care costs, and the opportunity cost of wide scale implementation must be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chew et al. (2020) studied Cryptogenic stroke. Implantable loop recorder monitoring vs. Conventional Holter monitoring and 30-day electrocardiography monitoring was evaluated on Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime discounted costs (ICER $40,796 per QALY gained). An implantable loop recorder for detecting atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke had an incremental cost of $40,796 per quality-adjusted life year gained compared with conventional monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: