Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
2-D spatial compounding has long been investigated to reduce speckle in ultrasound images. To further reduce speckle, several 3-D spatial compounding studies using 1-D and 1.5 D arrays with mechanical translation and position tracking have been reported. However, the fixed elevational focus and mechanical translation can degrade image quality in elevation. Using 2-D arrays, a better elevational resolution can be achieved with electronic focusing. Furthermore, 2-D arrays can generate greater number of independent images than 1-D arrays and the need for mechanical scanning is eliminated. In this paper, we present our 3-D spatial compounding images of two gel-based contrast phantoms and one resolution phantom. These images were acquired using a prototype 4 cm x 4 cm ultrasonic row-column prototype 2-D array operating at 5 MHz. Compounding nine decorrelated volumes showed a speckle signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement of 2.68. The average improvement of the lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was 2.45. However, using a smaller aperture to generate these volumes worsened the lateral resolution as predicted by theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awad et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: