Key result
Hospital-to-home care interventions, including structured education and follow-ups, significantly reduced readmission rates in six of nine studies and mortality in three of nine studies among heart failure patients in Japan.
Why the study?
Hospital-to-home care is important for improving quality of life in patients with heart failure, but evidence regarding intervention outcomes in Japan is limited.
Do hospital-to-home care interventions improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with heart failure in Japan?
Do hospital-to-home care interventions improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with heart failure in Japan?
Hospital-to-home care interventions, particularly those incorporating nurse-led education, counseling, and follow-ups, can significantly reduce readmissions and mortality while improving quality of life for heart failure patients in Japan.
Hospital-to-home care is important for improving the quality of life (QOL) of patients with heart failure (HF). However, there is little evidence of outcomes regarding hospital-to-home care interventions in Japan. Thus, this integrative review aimed to identify the components and outcomes of hospital-to-home care interventions for patients with HF in Japan. Electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web, were systematically searched, and all forms of hospital-to-home care interventions in Japan were examined. Studies regarding transitional care, discharge planning, home care, and disease management were included. The characteristics and results of the intervention studies were summarized. Furthermore, we analyzed the components of hospital-to-home care interventions and considered the effective interventions for patients with HF, based on statistically significant results. Ten articles including nine interventions were reviewed. The average age of intervention participants ranged from 64 to 77.5 years old, and the sample sizes in the intervention groups ranged from 11 to 192 participants. The intervention components were categorized as follows: "hospital-based components," "home- and outpatient-based components," and "both hospital- and home-based components." The main intervention components comprised structured education, lifetime counseling, and follow-ups via telephone and video calls. The clinical outcomes included readmission, mortality, and QOL, measured up to 24 months after the interventions. There was limited evidence of interventions being continued from the hospital to home, follow-up immediately after discharge, and nurse home visits in Japan. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the outcomes of patients' experiences immediately after discharge and the quality of care transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshimura et al. (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure (n=1,471). Hospital-to-home care interventions vs. Usual care was evaluated on Readmission, mortality, and QOL. Hospital-to-home care interventions, including structured education and follow-ups, significantly reduced readmission rates in six of nine studies and mortality in three of nine studies among heart failure patients in Japan.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: