The current geopolitical landscape is highly fragmented and complex. It is characterized by rising tensions, shifting alliances, and by a largely uncertain global governance. This turbulence has dire consequences, especially at territorial level: it may contribute to widening interregional disparities. Prior ex ante assessments of the way these instabilities may find a solution suggest that a scenario with the EU deepening its internal integration, coupled with tighter global economic linkages ( Integration scenario ), would yield stronger economic performance, associated with smaller increases in cross-country disparities. By contrast, a scenario with looser internal integration within the EU, coupled with a fragmented global economy ( Fragmentation scenario ), would bring about comparatively larger within-country disparities, as slower economic expansion would keep internal inequality more contained. In this paper we propose a set of simulations aiming at disentangle the role played by pre-market, in-market, and post-market factors in driving regional inequalities. Simulations are based on the fifth generation of the MAcroeconometric Social Sectoral Territorial (MASST5) model. Our results suggest a mosaic of often contradictory effects. Should either state of the world depicted in the two scenarios prevail, our simulation results provide a detailed picture of the mechanisms driving overall results, thereby informing policy interventions aiming at minimizing the negative effects of specific development patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caragliu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: