Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sunflower ( H elianthus annuus L .) productions reliance on a single source of cytoplasmic male sterility, PET 1, derived from H . petiolaris N utt., makes the crop genetically vulnerable. Twenty diverse cytoplasmic substitution lines from annual and perennial wild species were compared with the inbred line HA 89 over four environments. Pairwise comparisons of alloplasmic male fertile ( MF ) with euplasmic MF lines suggested that cytoplasm of perennial H. angustifolius increased lodging while perennial cytoplasms of H . mollis , H . grosseserratus , and H . divaricatus reduced head size and consequently reduced yield and will need to be used with caution. Lines having annual species, cytoplasms had no effects on agronomic traits. Comparisons of CMS HA 89 with 10 CMS lines suggested yield‐reducing cytoplasmic effects of perennial H . maximiliani and annual H . annuus PI 413178 and PI 413024. Cytoplasmic effects on oil percentage and fatty acid composition were minimal and should not be of concern for sunflower breeders. In general, most cytoplasms of wild annual H elianthus species accommodate cultivated nuclear genes without drastic adverse interactions, and are potential sources of cytoplasmic diversity for sunflower breeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: