Key result
Acoustic radiation force impulse combined with transient elastography improved the diagnostic accuracy for S≥2 liver fibrosis compared to ARFI alone (AUROC 0.949, P=0.009).
Why the study?
To evaluate the diagnostic value of ARFI imaging combined with TE for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Does ARFI combined with TE improve the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B compared to either modality alone?
Observational (n=121)
No
Does ARFI combined with TE improve the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B compared to either modality alone?
Combining acoustic radiation force impulse with transient elastography improves the diagnostic accuracy for early and significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
May improve noninvasive fibrosis staging; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before practice change.
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging combined with transient elastography (TE) for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Methods One hundred and twenty-one patients with CHB were included from October 2015 to June 2017 at the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Liver biopsy, routine biochemical tests, ARFI, and TE were carried out. The age, AST, ALT, ARFI, and TE were calculated and analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by pairwise comparisons using the SNK-q test. The results of ARFI and TE were compared with pathological results. Using the pathological stage of liver fibrosis as the ″golden standard″, the accuracy of ARFI and TE in diagnosing different stages of liver fibrosis were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Logistic regression was used to predict the risk of joint diagnosis, and ROC curve was drawn based on the predicted value to compare the diagnostic value of ARFI, TE, and their combination in S≥1 and S≥2 liver fibrosis. Results ARFI and TE were positively correlated with the fibrosis degree, and the correlation coefficients were 0.789 and 0.845, respectively (P 0.05), but the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combination were improved. The AUROC of the combined diagnosis for S≥2 was 0.949, which was only better than that of ARFI alone (P=0.009), but the sensitivity and accuracy of the combination were improved. Conclusions ARFI combined with TE improves the diagnosis of S≥1 and S≥2 liver fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mingru Gao (2019) conducted an observational in chronic hepatitis B (n=121). Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) combined with transient elastography (TE) vs. ARFI alone or TE alone was evaluated on Diagnosis of S≥2 liver fibrosis (AUROC 0.949, p=0.009). Acoustic radiation force impulse combined with transient elastography improved the diagnostic accuracy for S≥2 liver fibrosis compared to ARFI alone (AUROC 0.949, P=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: