Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For nearly five decades Congress has attempted to legislate both higher farm incomes and soil conservation. A national, interregional, demand‐endogenous, separable programming model is used to analyze the potential of alternative policies to achieve simultaneously the dual goals of increased farm income and reduced soil erosion. The analysis indicates that a conservation‐oriented land retirement policy can be designed to achieve an increase in net farm income equivalent to a traditional general land retirement policy, while simultaneously achieving significant reductions in gross soil erosion, chemical input use, and direct government program costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boggess et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: