Key result
Brief tetanic contraction evoked rapid onset vasodilatation via endothelial hyperpolarization, whereas rhythmic twitch contractions caused slow onset vasodilatation via nitric oxide production.
Ascending vasodilatation in skeletal muscle utilizes complementary endothelial signaling pathways (hyperpolarization vs nitric oxide) depending on the intensity and duration of muscle contraction.
Animal data warrant clinical caution; leaves open translation of contraction-specific vasodilatation mechanisms to humans.
Key points In response to exercise, vasodilatation ascends from downstream arterioles into upstream feed arteries (FAs). We hypothesized that the signalling events underlying ascending vasodilatation vary with the intensity and duration of skeletal muscle contraction. In the gluteus maximus muscle of C57BL/6 mice, brief tetanic contraction evoked rapid onset vasodilatation (ROV) (<1 s) throughout the resistance network. Selective damage to endothelium midway between FAs and primary arterioles eliminated ROV only in FAs. Blocking SK Ca and IK Ca channels attenuated ROV, implicating hyperpolarization as the underlying signal. During rhythmic twitch contractions, slow onset vasodilatation (10–15 s) in FAs remained intact following loss of ROV and was eliminated following nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Tetanic contraction initiates hyperpolarization that conducts along endothelium into FAs. Rhythmic twitch contractions stimulate FA endothelium to release nitric oxide in response to elevated shear stress secondary to metabolic dilatation of arterioles. Complementary endothelial signalling pathways for ascending vasodilatation ensure increased oxygen delivery to active skeletal muscle. Abstract In response to exercise, vasodilatation initiated within the microcirculation of skeletal muscle ascends the resistance network into upstream feed arteries (FAs) located external to the tissue. Ascending vasodilatation (AVD) is essential for reducing FA resistance that otherwise restricts blood flow into the microcirculation. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that signalling events underlying AVD vary with the intensity and duration of muscle contraction. In the gluteus maximus muscle of anaesthetized male C57BL/6 mice (aged 3–4 months), brief tetanic contraction (100 Hz for 500 ms) evoked rapid onset vasodilatation (ROV) in FAs that peaked within 4 s. By contrast, during rhythmic twitch contractions (4 Hz), slow onset vasodilatation (SOV) of FAs began after ∼10 s and plateaued within 30 s. Selectively damaging the endothelium with light‐dye treatment midway between a FA and its primary arteriole eliminated ROV in the FA along with conducted vasodilatation of the FA initiated on the arteriole using ACh microiontophoresis. Superfusion of SK Ca and IK Ca channel blockers UCL 1684 + TRAM 34 attenuated ROV, implicating endothelial hyperpolarization as the underlying signal. Nevertheless, the SOV of FAs during rhythmic contractions persisted until inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with N ω ‐nitro‐ l ‐arginine methyl ester. Thus, ROV of FAs reflects hyperpolarization of downstream arterioles that conducts along the endothelium into proximal FAs. By contrast, SOV of FAs reflects the local production of nitric oxide by the endothelium in response to luminal shear stress, which increases secondary to arteriolar dilatation downstream. Thus, AVD ensures increased oxygen delivery to active muscle fibres by reducing upstream resistance via complementary signalling pathways that reflect the intensity and duration of muscle contraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinkler et al. (2017) studied this question. Tetanic contraction versus rhythmic twitch contractions was evaluated on Rapid onset vasodilatation (ROV) and slow onset vasodilatation (SOV) in feed arteries. Brief tetanic contraction evoked rapid onset vasodilatation via endothelial hyperpolarization, whereas rhythmic twitch contractions caused slow onset vasodilatation via nitric oxide production.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: