Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: This study tests whether cut-off points of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group's (IADPSG) criteria had threshold effects on post-partum prediabetes and diabetes among Chinese pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 507 out of 1000 women with GDM (948 of them enrolled in a lifestyle trial during pregnancy) turned up for the follow-up study and underwent a 75-g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. GDM was diagnosed based on the IADPSG's criteria while post-partum diabetes and prediabetes were defined by the World Health Organization's. Generalized logit model was used to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of fasting, 1-h and 2-h plasma glucoses (PGs) for post-partum diabetes and prediabetes. Restricted cubic spline was used to identify any threshold effects. RESULTS: At a median of 9.1 weeks post-partum, 3.7% (n = 19) women developed post-partum diabetes and 35.1% (n = 178) developed post-partum prediabetes. Fasting PG ≥ 5.1 mmol/L was associated with markedly increased risk of post-partum diabetes without a discernible threshold (adjusted OR: 3.87, 95% CI: 1.03-14.52) while 2-h PG ≥ 8.5 and ≥ 9.0 mmol/L had threshold effects on post-partum prediabetes (2.10, 1.33-3.30) and diabetes (4.02, 1.04-15.56). The 1-h PG also had a threshold at ≥10.0 mmol/L for prediabetes (1.67, 1.06-2.64), but it was not significant for post-partum diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Among Chinese women with GDM, fasting PG ≥ 5.1 mmol/L was associated with post-partum diabetes without any discernible threshold effects while 2-h PG ≥ 8.5 and ≥ 9.0 mmol/L respectively identified women at high risk of post-partum prediabetes and diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: