BACKGROUND/AIMS: To establish a screening and treatment method for fovea-threatening diabetic macular edema (DME) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In order to maintain good visual acuity (VA), focal/grid laser treatment for screened fovea-threatening DME was evaluated based on macular thickness map images produced by SD-OCT. METHODS: In 66 diabetic eyes with no visual deterioration, the sensitivity and the specificity of SD-OCT without the use of mydriatics for the detection of fovea-threatening DME were determined. A definite diagnosis of DME was made under mydriasis, using slitlamp biomicroscopy with a contact lens. Eyes with fovea-threatening DME then underwent prophylactic focal/grid laser treatment. The main outcome measures were corrected VA and central macular thickness (CMT). RESULTS: A definitive diagnosis of DME was made in 5 of the 66 eyes, while macular thickening above the 99th percentile was detected in 11 (Cirrus®) or 13 (RS-3000®) eyes by SD-OCT. The focal/grid laser treatment of the 5 eyes with fovea-threatening DME successfully maintained good VA, which was 0.91 ± 0.76 (average: 20/22; 0.04 ± 0.12 logMAR) before treatment and 0.89 ± 0.70 (average: 20/22; 0.05 ± 0.15 logMAR; p = 0.88) 1 year afterwards. The average CMT was stable before and after focal/grid lasering at 302 ± 29 and 329 ± 55 µm, respectively (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The detection of fovea-threatening DME is feasible by SD-OCT without using mydriatics. Prophylactic treatment, such as with focal/grid lasers, was effective in maintaining good VA by avoiding an otherwise highly likely foveal involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirano et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: