Key result
Spikes in training and competition workloads increase injury risk in athletes, a relationship that requires investigation into underlying mediators and moderators.
Highlights the importance of understanding mediators and moderators in the relationship between workload spikes and injury risk in athletes.
Spikes in training and competition workloads, especially in undertrained athletes, increase injury risk.1 However, just as attributing athletic injuries to single risk factors is an oversimplification of the injury process,2 3 interpreting this workload-injury relationship should not be done in isolation. Instead, we must further unpack how (ie, through which mechanisms) workload spikes might result in injury, and what characteristics make athletes more robust or more susceptible to injury at any given workload. In other words, which factors mediate the workload-injury relationship, and which moderate the relationship. Like dominoes being knocked over, mediators can be viewed as the intermediary steps that explain the association between an observed variable and an outcome.4 In this context, mediating variables help to explain ‘why changes in workloads might cause injuries?’ For example, it is known that rugby league players exposed to spikes in running workloads, indicated by a high acute:chronic workload ratio, are at an increased risk for non-contact injuries.5 One potential explanation is that neuromuscular fatigue mediates this relationship, such that increased …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Windt et al. (2017) conducted an editorial in Athletic injuries. Workload spikes was evaluated. Spikes in training and competition workloads increase injury risk in athletes, a relationship that requires investigation into underlying mediators and moderators.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: