Summary This study investigated the role of dominance and level of activity and exploration on leadership in zebra e nches (Taenopygia guttata) searching for food. In pairs of zebra e nches fairly matched in size and that experienced the same level of food deprivation, the same bird consistently reached e rst one foraging patch over several trials. The same pattern of arrival to food occurred when resourceswere provided in two distant patches available concurrently, a situation that would potentially allow subordinates a greater access to resources. In further testing, the formation of new pairs with the same birds led to several changes in leadership, indicating that leadership is not an absolute feature. The member of a pair that proved to be the most activeand exploratory during independent, solitarytrialsbecame the leader in nearly all pairs tested. The same pattern held true in newly rearranged pairs where individuals often experienced changes in dominance status. Dominance failed to be associatedwith leadership in all tests. The results suggest that in a relatively egalitarian species, level of activity and exploration may be a stronger predictor of leadership than dominance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guy Beauchamp (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: