This brief note critically assesses the central arguments in Morato’s (Erkenntnis 79:327–349, 2014 ) recent contribution to the growing literature on Blackburn’s dilemma about necessity. In particular, I demonstrate that (i) neither of Morato’s two novel reconstructions of the dilemma’s contingency horn succeed, since both turn on false premises; and, (ii) Morato fails to adequately motivate his own response to these reconstructions. The upshot is that Morato has set himself a pair of flawed problems, then offered a flawed solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan Wildman (2017) studied this question.