Evaluation Researcher

The traditional view of evaluation researchers holds that evaluators must adhere to the role of objective scientist, but recently arguments have appeared in the literature critical of the notion that evaluation research can be conducted objectively. The author examines the validity of these arguments and posits that if these arguments are conceded, it becomes more acceptable to see evaluation research as a process of valuation and advocacy. There is a risk that evaluators who adopt the role of advocate may discredit their role as objective expert.