This study examines the relative effectiveness of formal cooperative learning (CL) compared to the traditional lecture-based instructions in improving instructional processes and learning outcomes. For this, the study used non-equivalent control groups design, collecting data from a sample of volunteered undergraduate students (n = 347) in a large public University in Ethiopia. In general, results indicate that higher perception of academic challenge, cooperative interaction, learning gains, and overall satisfaction were associated with formal CL, rather than traditional lecture-based instructions. In addition, results show that cooperative learning lessons were associated with more positive relations between academic challenge, cooperative interaction, learning gains, and overall satisfaction. Implications for higher education teaching and learning from a social interdependence theory perspective is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tadesse et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: