We give a general definition of unpolarized light that rests on invariance properties rather than specific values of second-order field correlations or, equivalently, the Stokes parameters. It turns out that to require invariance with respect to rotation around the propagation axis and symmetry with respect to left- and right-handed circular polarization is not sufficient to fully characterize completely unpolarized light, such as natural light. Actually, a third requirement demanding invariance with respect to phase retardation is needed. Depending on whether it is satisfied or not, we speak of type I or type II unpolarized light, and we specify the general form of both classical distribution functions and density operators consistent with the respective conditions. {} 1996 The American Physical Society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehner et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: