Why the study?
Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) have been underrepresented in trials evaluating DOACs in atrial fibrillation (AF), leaving unclear the impact of AS on outcomes and the comparative effects of DOACs versus warfarin.
Does aortic stenosis impact outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation, and are DOACs more effective than warfarin in patients with AF and AS?
Does aortic stenosis impact outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation, and are DOACs more effective than warfarin in patients with AF and AS?
In patients with atrial fibrillation, comorbid aortic stenosis increases the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and death, but DOACs remain more effective than warfarin for ischemic stroke prevention in this subgroup.
AS raises GI bleeding risk in AF; leaves open whether DOACs outperform warfarin for stroke prevention.
Background Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) have been underrepresented in the trials evaluating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess whether AS impacts outcomes in patients with AF and estimate the effects of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with AF and AS. Methods and Results The registry-based FinACAF (Finnish Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation) study covered all patients with AF diagnosed during 2007 to 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HRs) of first-ever gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, any bleeding, ischemic stroke, and death were estimated with cause-specific hazards regression adjusted for anticoagulant exposure variables. We identified 183 946 patients (50.5% women; mean age, 71.7 [SD, 13.5] years) with incident AF without prior bleeding or ischemic stroke, of whom 5231 (2.8%) had AS. The crude incidence rate of all outcomes was higher in patients with AS than in patients without AS. After propensity score matching, AS was associated with the hazard of any bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and death but not with intracranial bleeding or ischemic stroke (adjusted HRs, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.25-1.48], 1.63 [95% CI, 1.43-1.86], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.26-1.38], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.78-1.17], and 1.11 [95% CI, 0.99-1.25], respectively). Among patients with AS, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke when compared with warfarin, while bleeding and mortality did not differ between DOACs and warfarin. Conclusions AS is associated with substantially higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with AF. DOACs may be more effective in preventing ischemic stroke than warfarin in patients with AF and AS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04645537.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teppo et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: