CaTiO 3 (CT) and CaAl1/2Nb1/2O3 (CAN) have similar structures but very different dielectric properties. For CT at room temperature, the relative permittivity κ≈170 and the temperature coefficient of resonance frequency τf≈900×10−6 K−1, but for CAN, κ≈27 and τf≈−88×10−6 K−1. I use first-principles density functional theory calculations to investigate the origin of the contrasting behaviors. I find important differences between the two systems in both the frequencies and the eigenvectors of the low-frequency polar phonons. In CT, the frequencies are lower and the perovskite B site cations move against the surrounding oxygen octahedra; whereas in CAN, the frequencies are higher and the B site cations move with the oxygen octahedra. These two factors are equally important in explaining the differences in κ. I introduce and solve a decoupled quantum oscillator model for the temperature-dependent permittivity. This model predicts a large positive τf for CT and a small τf for CAN, in qualitative agreement with experiment. I relate the different dielectric behaviors to differences in the electronic structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric Cockayne (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: