Key result
Thrombolytics reliably restore flow in occluded dialysis catheters, whereas surface-treated catheters show disappointing outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over 330,000 individuals in the United States depend on hemodialysis (HD), the majority as a result of end-stage renal disease. Sustainable vascular access can be achieved through arteriovenous fistulas, arteriovenous grafts, or tunneled catheters. Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) often remain in use for months or even years, long beyond their initial intended use as a bridging device. Research efforts are focused on identifying strategies to prevent/minimize the risk of the most common catheter-related complications: thrombotic occlusion and infection. Thrombotic occlusion of TDCs prevents adequate dialysis but can be managed successfully through thrombolytic agents to restore/improve blood flow in the majority of patients, allowing immediate HD delivery and prolonging usability of the TDC. Occasionally, catheter exchange with fibrin sheath disruption is needed to preserve the site. Surface-treated catheters could improve the morbidity and mortality associated with HD delivery via an indwelling catheter, but results from studies have been disappointing to date. We review the etiology of catheter-based access failure and the monitoring and interventional steps that should be taken to maintain the patency and safety of catheters for HD. Wherever possible we note the areas in which there is scant data where further randomized clinical trials are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Besarab et al. (2010) conducted a review in End-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis via tunneled dialysis catheters. Tunneled dialysis catheter management (thrombolytic agents, catheter exchange with fibrin sheath disruption, surface-treated catheters) was evaluated on Catheter patency, thrombotic occlusion, and infection. Thrombolytic agents restore blood flow in most tunneled dialysis catheters with thrombotic occlusion, whereas surface-treated catheters have shown disappointing results to date.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: