Why the study?
Epicardial adipose tissue, particularly in the left atrium, has garnered attention in the pathophysiology of AF, motivating an overview of the association between LA-EAT thickness and AF incidence.
Is increased left atrial epicardial adipose tissue (LA-EAT) thickness associated with an elevated risk of atrial fibrillation?
Is increased left atrial epicardial adipose tissue (LA-EAT) thickness associated with an elevated risk of atrial fibrillation?
This review highlights that increased left atrial epicardial adipose tissue thickness is associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation, emphasizing its potential role in AF pathophysiology.
LA-EAT thickness associates with AF incidence; leaves open causal mechanisms and targeted interventions in arrhythmia management.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The role of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), particularly in the left atrium, has garnered attention in the pathophysiology of AF. This review aims to provide an overview of the association between the thickness of left atrial epicardial adipose tissue (LA-EAT) and the incidence of AF, while exploring the arrhythmogenic effects of LA-EAT and the impact of epicardial fat tissue changes with age and in pathological conditions. A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted, and relevant studies were selected based on their inclusion criteria. The findings suggest that increased LA-EAT thickness is associated with an elevated risk of AF, potentially mediated through inflammatory and proarrhythmic effects. Age-related changes in epicardial fat tissue and alterations in pathological conditions, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular diseases, further contribute to the development and progression of AF. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of these mechanisms and their clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fahimi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: