This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Herein, we present comparative device analyses that help understand the charge-transport behavior in polymer field-effect transistors (PFETs) in which synthesized diketopyrrolopyrrole-based (DPP-based) conjugated copolymers bearing chalcogenophene units are used as semiconducting channel materials. The copolymer backbone orientations were successfully modified by tailoring the spacer units of the conjugated copolymers to be face-on-oriented for DPP-based copolymers bearing methylthiophene-furan-methylthiophene units ( PDPP-MT-F-MT ) and edge-on-oriented for the corresponding thiophene ( PDPP-MT-T-MT )- and selenophene ( PDPP-MT-Se-MT )-containing copolymers. Higher backbone planarity and higher field-effect mobilities were expected for the edge-on-oriented DPP-based copolymers ( PDPP-MT-T-MT and PDPP-MT-Se-MT ) based on density functional theory calculations; however, the face-on-oriented PDPP-MT-F-MT -based PFET exhibited superior electrical performance in terms of field-effect mobility. Charge-transport analyses based on the Gaussian disorder model, focusing on the charge-transport behavior of the disordered (amorphous) domains in the DPP-based polymer films, revealed that the localized states in the disordered domains of the face-oriented PDPP-MT-F-MT become more delocalized than those of the edge-oriented PDPP-MT-T-MT and PDPP-MT-Se-MT polymers when a gate bias is applied to their PFETs. Therefore, we attribute the electrical performance of a DPP-based PFET to the degree of delocalization of the disordered domains of its DPP-based polymer, which has a significant impact on the charge-transport behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: