Why the study?
The study investigated the prevalence of retinal vascular occlusion and intraocular bleeding and compared their risks between NOAC and warfarin therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF.
Does NOAC therapy compared to warfarin affect the risk of retinal vascular occlusion and intraocular bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does NOAC therapy compared to warfarin affect the risk of retinal vascular occlusion and intraocular bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, NOAC use is associated with a higher risk of retinal vascular occlusion but a lower risk of intraocular bleeding compared to warfarin.
NOAC use was associated with higher retinal occlusion but lower intraocular bleeding risk versus warfarin; leaves open optimal anticoagulation for ocular safety in AF.
We investigated the prevalence of retinal vascular occlusion and intraocular bleeding and compare their risks in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy, either with non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) or warfarin. We performed a cohort study (January 2015 to April 2018) in 281,970 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) using health claims in the nationwide database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment service of Korea. A Cox-proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for retinal vascular occlusion or intraocular bleeding. The HR of retinal vascular occlusion was estimated to 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.86) for NOAC users compared to that with warfarin users. Among the various types of NOACs, all NOACs showed higher risk of retinal vascular occlusion than did warfarin. For intraocular bleeding, the HR was estimated to be 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98) for NOAC users compared with that with warfarin users. The risk of retinal vascular occlusion was higher in NOAC users than in warfarin users, while the risk of intraocular bleeding was lower with NOAC therapy. NOACs were not found to be as effective as warfarin for retinal vascular occlusion, but safe in terms of intraocular bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: