BACKGROUND: This crossover, open-label clinical study evaluated the potential for clinically relevant drug interactions between ritonavir-boosted elvitegravir (elvitegravir/r), an HIV integrase inhibitor, and etravirine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomized into one of two groups, each with two arms. Group 1 (n = 20) followed a sequence of 10-day dosing of elvitegravir/r (150/100 mg once daily) and elvitegravir/r plus etravirine (200 mg twice daily) or the reverse (n = 10 per sequence). Group 2 (n = 14) followed a sequence of 10-day dosing of etravirine and etravirine plus elvitegravir/r or the reverse (n = 7 per sequence), all under fed conditions. Elvitegravir, ritonavir and etravirine pharmacokinetics were determined on days 10 and 20 using non-compartmental analyses. Lack of pharmacokinetic alteration bounds for 90% confidence intervals (CI) about the geometric mean ratio (GMR; coadministration versus alone) were 70-143% for elvitegravir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics (maximum concentration [C(max)], concentration at the end of the dosing interval [C(tau)] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(tau); 0-24 h] and 80-125% for etravirine pharmacokinetics (AUC(tau) 0-12 h). RESULTS: Of the 34 enrolled participants, 31 completed the study. There were three discontinuations, but none were caused by adverse events (AEs). The most common treatment-emergent AE was headache. Elvitegravir pharmacokinetic GMR was 6-7% higher following elvitegravir/r plus etravirine dosing versus elvitegravir/r. The GMR for etravirine and ritonavir AUC(tau) were 2.4% and 12.3% lower, respectively. Importantly, the 90% CI for elvitegravir and etravirine pharmacokinetics and AUC(tau) and C(max) for ritonavir were within the lack of alteration bounds. CONCLUSIONS: Elvitegravir/r and etravirine do not undergo clinically relevant drug interactions and can be coadministered without dose adjustment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramanathan et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: