Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The cross‐sectional nature of much social data, coupled with the static view provided by maps and current spatial data handling software, have produced a tradition of research on urban spatial structure that is largely two‐dimensional and derived from residential locations. The paper presents an analysis of a space‐time diary data set collected in Halifax, Nova Scotia. A series of transformations are used to convert the individual diary records to a three‐mode matrix of intensities, which is then analyzed using the PARAFAC three‐mode factor model. Home/work is found to be the strongest organizing dimension of the urban space‐time, followed by entertainment, shopping, and education / work. We show how these dimensions appear to varying degrees in different locations, time periods, and human activities. The paper argues for a dynamic view of urban spatial structure in which only the physical facilities remain static.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodchild et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: