This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Midwives are essential in securing high-quality maternity care. Despite several calls to action to curb the attrition rates of midwives, it is a continuing worldwide problem. Little is known about midwiveś work motivation, and understanding this can be key to improving well-being among midwives and thus lowering attrition rates. This study specifically explored midwiveś work-life from a salutogenic perspective focusing on aspects contributing to work motivation rather reasons behind resignation rates. OBJECTIVE: To explore midwives' experiences and perceptions of work motivation from a salutogenic perspective. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with 15 female midwives working in two medium-sized labor wards (approximately 1600 childbirths annually). Participants were interviewed between December 2023 and April 2024. Data was synthesized using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: The analyses resulted in three themes: labor ward size, work-life balance and recognition. Participants elaborated on how workplace size, supportive relationships, self-awareness in work practice, and recognition from patients, peers, and management were key to work motivation. Notably, one of the labor wards had a significantly high proportion of midwives with over 15 years of experience. CONCLUSION: By exploring midwives' experiences through a salutogenic lens, this study highlights key aspects that foster work motivation and professional well-being. Key motivators included manageable ward size, supportive relationships, work-life balance, and recognition from patients, colleagues, and leadership. Notably, a labor ward with a high proportion of experienced midwives exemplified how these factors can foster long-term engagement. Future research could implement different strategies to test how they improve midwives' motivation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Storm et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: