This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Nitrogen export from small forested watersheds is known to be affected by N deposition but with high regional variability. We studied 10 headwater catchments in the northeastern United States across a gradient of N deposition (5.4 − 9.4 kg ha −1 yr −1 ) to determine if soil nitrification rates could explain differences in stream water NO 3 − export. Average annual export of two years (October 2002 through September 2004) varied from 0.1 kg NO 3 − ‐N ha −1 yr −1 at Cone Pond watershed in New Hampshire to 5.1 kg ha −1 yr −1 at Buck Creek South in the western Adirondack Mountains of New York. Potential net nitrification rates and relative nitrification (fraction of inorganic N as NO 3 − ) were measured in Oa or A soil horizons at 21–130 sampling points throughout each watershed. Stream NO 3 − export was positively related to nitrification rates ( r 2 = 0.34, p = 0.04) and the relative nitrification ( r 2 = 0.37, p = 0.04). These relationships were much improved by restricting consideration to the 6 watersheds with a higher number of rate measurements (59–130) taken in transects parallel to the streams ( r 2 of 0.84 and 0.70 for the nitrification rate and relative nitrification, respectively). Potential nitrification rates were also a better predictor of NO 3 − export when data were limited to either the 6 sampling points closest to the watershed outlet ( r 2 = 0.75) or sampling points <250 m from the watershed outlet ( r 2 = 0.68). The basal area of conifer species at the sampling plots was negatively related to NO 3 − export. These spatial relationships found here suggest a strong influence of near‐stream and near‐watershed‐outlet soils on measured stream NO 3 − export.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: