Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary: 2,2,6,6‐Tetramethylpiperidine 1‐oxyl (TEMPO)‐containing N ‐propargylamide HCCCH 2 NHCO‐4‐TEMPO ( 1 ), propargyl ester HCCCH 2 OCO‐4‐TEMPO ( 2 ), phenylacetylene derivative HCCC 6 H 3 ‐3,4‐(CO 2 ‐4‐TEMPO) 2 ( 3 ), and norbornene diester monomers, NB‐2,3‐ exo,exo ‐(CH 2 OCO‐4‐TEMPO) 2 ( 4 ), NB‐2,3‐ endo,exo ‐(COO‐4‐TEMPO) 2 ( 5a ), NB‐2,3‐ endo,endo ‐(COO‐4‐TEMPO) 2 ( 5b ) (NB = norbornene, TEMPO = 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐piperidinyloxyl) were synthesized and polymerized with rhodium and ruthenium catalysts. Monomers 2 , 5a , and 5b gave polymers with number‐average molecular weights of 47 000–185 000 in 59–100% yields, while 1 , 3 , and 4 gave polymers insoluble in common organic solvents in 88–100% yields. The capacities of cells fabricated with poly( 1 ), poly( 2 ), and poly( 3 ) were 67, 82, and 23 Ah · kg −1 based on the weight, respectively. The capacity of poly( 5a )‐based cell reached the theoretical value (109 Ah · kg −1 ) of the polymer. Charge–discharge curves of poly( 5a ) at a current density of 0.13 mA · cm −2 (100 mA · g −1 ‐cathode active material ) in the voltage range of 2.5–4.2 V. magnified image Charge–discharge curves of poly( 5a ) at a current density of 0.13 mA · cm −2 (100 mA · g −1 ‐cathode active material ) in the voltage range of 2.5–4.2 V.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsumata et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: