The worldwide impact of COVID-19 has reached all spheres of human functioning. Such impact on social, relationship, and individual spheres has posed strong challenges within all scientific areas. Most branches of science, including those relating to human sexuality, are now called at providing new means on how to best deal with COVID-19. In this work, we will approach what we consider may be some of the core challenges emerging within the field of clinical sexology∗ We are using Clinical Sexology as an umbrella term aimed at including Sexual Medicine, Sex Therapy, Sexual Counseling in a clinical contex, or any clinical specialty working within the field of sexual health, namely with sexual problems. The recent scenario of pandemic has exposed several vulnerabilities within worldwide health-care and social systems, some of them including services concerning sexual health and human sexual rights. On the other hand, it also brought to light a remarkable social awareness on so many issues tapping into the scope of clinical sexology (eg, sexual and reproductive health, human sexual rights, relationships, and sexuality). In times of pandemic, the focus on sexuality-related issues is a notable sign of how services and science in sexuality are significant, even when survival issues are priority. One of the major topics that was brought to the center of discussion was e-Health interventions, that is, the use of communication and information technologies for health (eg, SMS, e-mail, video call, apps, etc.). The World Health Organization followed by key professional societies such as the American Psychological Association deemed e-Health a priority target for the improvement of public and universal health.1 The need of universal health was made real for countless citizens who have never experienced a crisis with such a dimension as the current pandemic. The time of COVID-19 has required health-care and social systems, clinicians, and citizens to adjust to the digital era in a matter of days. e-Health interventions in clinical sexology have been promoted earlier. Even so, there is little evidence on how professionals and patients appraise such tools and whether these are effective. Indeed, before current pandemic, there was not an established baseline on how well professionals working in the fields of clinical sexology dealt with e-Health. COVID-19 seems to have triggered a research need that was forgotten in the clinical sexology context, with strong clinical implications, for example, treatment effectiveness, therapeutic adherence, competence to deliver e-Health interventions. Although the extension of the challenges imposed by e-Health can only be accurately measured after the COVID-19 crisis, we believe that ongoing clinical guidelines on clinical sexology should include specific standards in e-Health. Even further, these standards should carefully look at the ethical challenges tied to digital clinical interventions, and to what extent these challenges may eventually change across countries and health-care systems, or within the different branches working in the field of human sexuality. Ultimately, we must answer the question, how far is clinical sexology from universal health. In addition, it is worth mentioning the effects of the pandemic on the working routines of sexual health professionals. Professionals working in the sexuality field, particularly those who exclusively depend on private practice, are possibly facing unstable economical situations. These professionals may further lack competence to provide e-Health services, as well as their usual network for referral and supervision. We are further aware some clinical sexology professionals were relocated to prioritize COVID-19 assistance, reducing sexual health services and assistance. In our view, key professional societies in the fields of sexual medicine, sex therapy, and sexual counseling may play a supportive role, delivering formative, guideline, and networking solutions (see Table 1 for a summary of recommendations). Summary of recommendations in the context of COVID-19 (expert opinion) Summary of recommendations in the context of COVID-19 (expert opinion) Many of the topics discussed in the context of the societal consequences of COVID-19 emphasize the pandemic's deleterious effects in women. The United Nations acknowledged that sexual and reproductive health care is particularly at risk during the crisis, leaving women exposed to increased vulnerability.2 In Portugal, despite the maintenance of health care concerning sexual and reproductive issues, professionals have detected a significant decrease of women attending obstetrician and gynecology emergency services. These women were known to use these services as the first line to report partner's physical violence or sexual abuse. We are thus aware of an undetected proportion of women at high risk of (sexual) victimization. These women have been unintentionally neglected by the system, and this may last for the entire lockdown. While physical and sexual abuse are themes continuously under debate, we must acknowledge that lockdown situations require additional measures that were not previously designed. In a similar vein, gender inequalities regarding working place have been under social debate. Given lockdown, families are now combining domestic tasks, including their children's school needs, with teleworking. Such scenario is believed to maximize the deleterious effects of COVID-19 in women as well. In all, the effects of pandemics extend well beyond survival issues, reaching fundamental human rights, including sexual rights, which we must consider before next lockdowns. In line with the World Association for Sexual Health resolutions on human sexual rights in the context of COVID-19,3 it seems undeniable that professionals working within the diverse branches of human sexuality help to preserve fundamental aspects on human sexual rights, including gender equality, in times of pandemics. Contextual changes have a marked impact on relationships, causing crises and imbalance, but also improvement opportunities. The ability to adapt is a key feature characterizing high-level satisfaction and marital quality relationships. Partners’ sexuality is expected to be impacted by adaptation demands, as sexual satisfaction and functioning largely depends on relationship dynamics that might be at risk during crises. Conversely, such dynamics are also impacted by sexual functioning outcomes. Indeed, sexuality plays a determining role in maintaining relationships. In the current adaptation scenario, professionals are called at performing a close inspection of relationship factors, as these may overshadow sexual concerns. Within this context, is worth noting that the COVID-19 lockdown has shaped new relationship configurations. People in a loving relationship of commitment are going through lay off, unemployment, telework, and so forth, and this may apply to one or both partners. Furthermore, most partners are likely combining professional, parenthood, and caregiving demands, assuming new roles within their relationship dynamics. Professionals in sexual medicine, sex therapy, and sexual counseling must now shape their assessment and intervention tools as to fit the new relationship constellations and further consider the mental health impact of such reality. We must be especially attentive to the exacerbation of pre-existing symptomatology, as well as emerging difficulties, which may feel unexpected for the couple. The new daily stressors (eg, parenthood demands, reorganization of family subsystems, reduced incomes) should be evaluated as their management can deem both romantic and sexual needs to a secondary role.4 Such stressors may further have a differentiated impact in partners, increasing feelings of distressful sexual desire discrepancy,5 diminishing important contextual and emotional triggers for the experience of sexual arousal,6 or lowering the ludic elements that are associated with sexual satisfaction,7 whether we are dealing with same-gender or gender-diverse relationships. Within this regard, is worth mentioning that emotional expression, sexual self-disclosure, and intimacy are important predictors of sexual satisfaction and may need to be optimized.8,9 In addition, many people in dating relationships who have decided to cohabit, or even get married, were caught in the context of the pandemic. These individuals may experience some ambiguity regarding the meaning of their decision, and must now deal with defrauded expectations, which may further prompt new areas of relationship tension. Similarly, people in consensual nonmonogamous relationships may have to struggle to find cohabitation solutions that are equitable for the different relationships they are involved with and may have to do options that deprive them from living in full their relationship orientation. Professionals cannot neglect this aspect as well. All these relationship dynamics may challenge sexual medicine professionals to refer patients to couple therapists with training in sexology. COVID-19 has further launched a massive discussion on how individuals deal with the emotional states prompted by lockdown and social isolation. This too is expected to impact individuals' sexual health and functioning, as we are aware of the role of emotional states in human sexual response and behavior. Low positive effect and depressive mood were particularly linked to sexual difficulties and dysfunction.10 However, this is a challenging relationship, as in some of the cases, negative mood actually trigger sexual response, including sexual desire and arousal,11 or masturbation.12 Even further, individuals were found to tune attention toward sexual contents under sad mood, which may be regarded as an adaptive behavior aimed at ensuring reproduction or the maintenance of affective bonds, even in the presence of negative events.13 On the other hand, increased sexual desire and arousal during negative affective states have been regarded as a coping mechanism; individuals are believed to use sex as means to cope with dysfunctional mood.14 Furthermore, and to our concern, such dynamic has been linked to risky sex and may underpin hypersexuality-like conditions.15 This scenario has been under informal debate as we recognized that COVID-19, lockdown, and the social isolation measures might trigger maladjusted sexual behavior by prompting dysfunctional mood states. Indeed, boredom has been posit as a potential trigger of hypersexuality-like behaviors (eg, high frequency of pornography consumption and cybersex) and was found among the psychological features of sexual addicts.16 Online sexual activities are thus believed to be used to manage boredom.16 Accordingly, one special challenge that emerged in the current pandemic was to manage the expected increase in symptom severity within hypersexuality-like conditions. Increasing the monitoring of symptoms and maladaptive emotional states using communication and information technology tools may be used as an option, although we can only discuss its efficacy in the long term. Similarly, sexually offending behavior may be triggered by negative emotional states.17 In addition, boredom, stress, or anxiety was shown to increase deviant sexual fantasies in adult and child sexual offenders.18,19 In the current lockdown, this is of course worrisome. We speculate a high chance of sexual victimization, particularly within intimate relationships. This may be also true regarding intrafamiliar sexual abuse of minors, as children are now confined with offenders. Is worth noting that in Portugal, sexual offenders are not tracked after release. Also, despite the absence of official statistics at the moment in Portugal, a great focus on sexting behaviors (particularly performed by adolescents), as well as on child pornography incitement, has been reported. Such scenario poses us the challenge on how to best address sexual education and prevention of sexual abuse, bearing in mind that lockdown and physical isolation may prompt risky behaviors. Psychological distress triggered by COVID-19 varies as a function of people's exposure (ie, contaminated, exposed, in isolation, or not isolated) and is associated with perceived individual risk and beliefs about the disease.20 Psychological distress in this specific scenario must be accounted by sexual health professionals, given the strong comorbidity between emotional disorders and sexual dysfunction.21 Clinicians must disentangle whether sexual complaints such as low sexual desire emerge within dyadic processes or, instead, if they result from other psychopathology conditions such as depression, anxiety, or even post-traumatic stress disorder. Such distinction will likely determine the course of treatment. Likewise, psychological distress can make it challenging to enjoy erotic experiences, either because of difficulties in letting go and enjoying the experience or because of problems in personal and interpersonal emotional regulation, increasing the chance of marital conflict. Still within this regard, we highlight the role of body dissatisfaction in sexual functioning. Body image dissatisfaction is impacted by emotional ingestion, which is a dysfunctional coping strategy aimed at dealing with negative emotional states. Emotional ingestion may be maximized by lockdown and COVID-19–associated distress. Within this context, it has been recognized that individuals endorsing an inflexible pattern of body image beliefs are expected to increase cognitive distraction during sexual activity, and a phenomenon known as spectatoring, associated with sexual difficulties and dysfunction. Although the social and health impacts of COVID-19 are under study throughout the globe, only at the end of the pandemic we may have a clear and empirically supported view of the major challenges and best approaches emerging from COVID-19. In line with this trend, we are aware of the many attempts to research the impact of COVID-19 in all spheres of sexuality. Fortunately, such attempts will eventually translate into a progress within the fields of sexual medicine, sex therapy, and sexual counseling. We hope we will be able to deliver better practices for times of crisis, and above all, to ensure human sexual rights despite adversity. Conception and Design Joana Carvalho, Patrícia M. Pascoal Drafting the Article Joana Carvalho, Patrícia M. Pascoal Revising It for Intellectual Content Joana Carvalho, Patrícia M. Pascoal Final Approval of the Completed Article Joana Carvalho, Patrícia Pascoal None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: