Why the study?
Traditional preoperative testing batteries and medical clearance referrals are costly, inefficient, and do not clearly reduce perioperative morbidity or mortality.
Does a patient-centric, personalized, and multidisciplinary approach to preoperative care improve outcomes and streamline workflow compared to traditional routine testing in otolaryngologic surgery?
Does a patient-centric, personalized, and multidisciplinary approach to preoperative care improve outcomes and streamline workflow compared to traditional routine testing in otolaryngologic surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A personalized, multidisciplinary algorithmic approach to preoperative assessment is recommended over routine testing batteries for otolaryngologic surgery to optimize outcomes and efficiency.
There is a narrow window of opportunity between surgical scheduling and the operative date to optimize patients for an elective surgical procedure. Traditionally, preoperative care has involved extended routine testing batteries with intermittent referrals for medical clearance. These traditions are costly, inefficient, and yield no clear reduction in perioperative morbidity and mortality. Evidence, which has evolved over the past decade, suggests that optimal preoperative care requires a patient-centric, personalized, and often multidisciplinary approach. We present an up-to-date overview of this literature with a focus on the otolaryngologic surgical population. An algorithmic approach to preoperative patient assessment is also proposed in hopes of both optimizing patient outcome and streamlining routine clinical workflow. Laryngoscope, 130:38-44, 2020.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nickel et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: