Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Essential tremor (ET) is a chronic, progressive neurological disease. Head (neck) tremor may eventually develop in as many as 30-60% of patients, yet it is unclear why. Is its appearance merely a function of advancing disease duration? Alternatively, is patient age a primary factor? The latter would argue for the presence of a biological clock that is important for the expression of this clinical feature of ET. METHODS: A total of 363 ET patients were enrolled in a cross-sectional, clinical-epidemiological study. Each ET patient underwent a 20-min videotaped neurological examination which included an assessment of the presence/absence of head tremor. RESULTS: Head tremor was present on examination in 140 (38.6%) patients. Young patients, even with longer-duration tremor, rarely had head tremor: 2/27 (7.4%) patients<40 years old with tremor duration≥10 years had head tremor versus 121/283 (42.8%) older patients (>60 years old) with tremor duration≥10 years (p<0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, while head tremor was associated with age (p<0.001) it was not independently associated with tremor duration (p=0.26); interestingly, it was associated with gender in that model (p<0.001). With the exception of 1 patient, head tremor did not begin before the age of 36. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that the appearance of head tremor in ET depends on a biological factor that is intrinsic to the patient (i.e. age) and is not a clear consequence of advancing disease duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elan D. Louis (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: