In this review essay I argue that accounting research as it is currently constituted can be viewed as a banal practice in that the majority of research is largely insulated from and irrelevant to the majority of the world’s population. Starting from prior research on “subalternity” I propose that accounting research is primarily a practice of the center, that the institutional field of accounting contributes to the unoriginal and partisan nature of accounting research, and finally that a consideration of the social location of accounting scholarship provides a tentative vantage point for decreasing the insularity and increasing the relevance of accounting research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dean Neu (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: