Why the study?
Does increased contact pressure from self-expanding aortic valves predict new conduction abnormalities after TAVR?
Does increased contact pressure from self-expanding aortic valves predict new conduction abnormalities after TAVR?
Patient-specific computer simulations demonstrate that higher contact pressure and contact pressure index on the aortic root are independent predictors of new conduction abnormalities after TAVR with self-expanding valves.
Higher simulated contact pressure may flag conduction risk after TAVR; leaves open whether valve design or positioning modifications reduce events.
Background: The extent to which pressure generated by the valve on the aortic root plays a role in the genesis of conduction abnormalities after TAVR is unknown. Purpose: To elucidate the role of contact pressure and contact pressure area in the development of conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using patient-specific computer simulations. Methods: Finite-element computer simulations were performed to simulate TAVR of 112 patients who had undergone TAVR with the self-expanding CoreValve/Evolut R valve. Based on pre-operative multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), a patient-specific region of the aortic root containing the atrioventricular conduction system was determined by identifying the membranous septum. Contact pressure and contact pressure index (percentage of are subjected to pressure) were quantified and compared in patients with and without new conduction abnormalities. Results: Sixty-two patients (55%) developed a new left bundle branch block or a high degree atrioventricular block after TAVR. Maximum contact pressure and contact pressure index (median [IQR]) were significantly higher in patients with compared to those without new conduction abnormalities (0.47MPa [0.40–0.67] and 35% [22–46], respectively versus 0.25MPa [0.01–0.43] and 13% [0–28]). By multivariate regression analysis only maximum contact pressure (OR: 1.28, CI: 1.0–1.6, p=0.02) and contact pressure (OR: 1.54, CI: 1.1–2.1, p=0.01) were identified as independent predictors for conduction abnormalities, but not implantation depth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocatello et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: